Comparison

PNG vs. WebP: Lossless Clarity vs. Next-Gen Web Compression

PNG has long been the gold standard for alpha transparency and lossless graphics. Google designed WebP Lossless to directly replace PNG by leveraging advanced entropy coding (spatial prediction and color cache), shrinking assets significantly without quality loss.

PNG (Portable Network Graphics) vs WebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha)

The Short Answer

WebP is typically 26% smaller than PNG in lossless mode while preserving pixel-perfect alpha transparency. Convert PNG to WebP for modern web apps, keeping PNG primarily for raw source assets and legacy print software.

Feature by Feature

PNG (Portable Network Graphics) compared with WebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha), feature by feature
FeaturePNG (Portable Network Graphics)WebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha)Better here
Lossless CompressionDeflate (LZ77 + Huffman)Spatial Prediction + Color Transform (26% smaller)WebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha)
Alpha TransparencyFull 8-bit & 24-bit AlphaFull 8-bit Alpha in Lossless & LossyEvenly matched
Animation SupportAPNG (Limited support)Animated WebP (Widely supported)WebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha)
Google Core Web VitalsOften triggers "Serve images in next-gen formats"Fully passes PageSpeed AuditsWebP (Lossless & Lossy Alpha)
Universal Compatibility100% (All platforms since 1996)97.4% (All modern browsers)PNG (Portable Network Graphics)
Encoding SpeedFast CPU encodeSlightly higher encode time, faster decodePNG (Portable Network Graphics)

Pros and Cons

PNG Advantages & Limitations

Strengths

  • Universal desktop and legacy software support
  • Unsurpassed vector/screenshot pixel fidelity
  • Extensive editing tools ecosystem

Trade-offs

  • High bandwidth consumption
  • Significantly larger payloads slow mobile LCP
  • No native lossy compression mode

WebP Advantages & Limitations

Strengths

  • 26% smaller files than equivalent PNGs
  • Supports both lossless and lossy compression with alpha
  • Reduces bandwidth and hosting costs

Trade-offs

  • Older legacy image editors may require conversion plugins